Monday, October 4, 2010

An evil spirit called, "Self focus"






Once again I am handing my “blogging reins” over to someone who has guest blogged for me before, the mysterious “T”. I was suffering from some stress and anxiety, something that happens in spells. My doctor has suggested medication but so far I have chosen to pray myself through these dark periods. It's not easy but by praying, reading the Psalms through and, as it turns out, telling others I have victory over thoughts of defeat and depression. My friend wrote me the following e mail after a long conversation on the phone. I hope you all benefit from her Godly wisdom as I have.



Hi Sharon,



I was glad to see you last night, and glad you worked things out in your heart and mind so that you could be there to be used as God sees fit.  That is a blessing.  This morning, I woke up with a thought for both of us, as I also struggle with being hard on myself and mincing over every little wrong thing I perceive I may have done….



First, the scripture says…draw near to God and he will draw near to you….this is the way to resist the devil so that he will flee from you.  The next time you begin to hear the accusing voice in your head, stop and tell God you want to draw near to him right in that moment.  Maybe you could find a verse of comfort to memorize that assures you of drawing near to God in just such a moment.  Tell God you are feeling negative and being accused.  Draw near to God the best you can…he will draw near to you.



Next, the cure for worry and self-focus is to be grateful for what God has provided.  I learned to appreciate doing the dishes at my house by keeping in mind that many in the universe have no dishes, and I learned to thank God for my dishes, even when they are dirty and need cleaning (seems a constant chore at my house for some reason).  The next time you go home from Leader’s meeting with accusing thoughts about yourself or others…make a list of things to be thankful for.  Think about everything God did that morning to provide, protect, defend, prepare, and give to you, and ignore the voice that says you did something wrong.  Gratefulness is the cure for grumbling, even when we grumble at ourselves.  Break it down to even the simplest things, like thanking God we sit on chairs instead of on the ground, that we have lights and heat, that we can read and know his Word for ourselves, that God chose you to be there, and on and on and on.  Do it for as long as it takes to make the voices of doubt go away.  All day if need be…we have many things to be grateful for, and this is something I know you can do as I have seen you be grateful on this level many times already.  It is the key to changing your focus.



I am learning this same habit, and it really helps.  I was so glad for the principles of last week’s lesson…because exalting God is the way to navigate these kinds of nasty waters, and it is important to learn to do that as a daily, moment by moment habit.



I hope this helps you, and I will be thrilled to hear how you are doing with it over this year.  We can catch each other up on our progress in this area when we go to Joe Muggs for coffee!



Any thoughts you can add?  I’d love to know how you feel about this idea.

Love,

T

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Books on Sign Language

When I taught in public school I had a number of deaf children in my classes. This piqued my interest in sign language and I began to teach myself how to sign. I found a free online site http://lifeprint.com/ which had lessons and I bought books that showed through photos and illustrations the signs for various words. After awhile, though never fluent, I was able to sign basic sentences to my deaf students. To me sign language is fascinating and like any other language offers insight into my own native language. Here's a couple of books that I recommend.






Webster's American Sign Language Dictionary by Elaine Costello, Ph.D





 Signing Everyday Phrases by Mickey Flodin













If you just want a basic dictionary with illustrations, these two books offer a good resource for vocabulary.


Talking With Your Hands, Listening With Your Eyes: A Complete Photographic Guide to American Sign Language by Gabriel Grayson


This next book was made by a man who is an interpreter for the deaf in the New York City Circuit courts. Although hearing himself, both of Grayson's parents were deaf. His book contains photographs of different signers that, with the exception of him, are all deaf. Each person is introduced at the beginning of the book, with a brief but interesting biography.


Also included throughout the book are little vignettes of trivia about famous deaf people, the origin of sign language and other interesting tidbits of information about sign language.

All three books and the online course are worth buying and having more than one book is necessary because none of them have complete vocabularies.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Putting Faith in a Man Made Ideal: The Whisperers by Orlando Figes







https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51cWwwpy8VL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg




What we overheard the adults say in a whisper...we knew we could not repeat to anyone.






We went through life afraid to talk. Mama used to say that every other person was an informer. We were afraid of our neighbors, and especially of the police....Even today, if I see a policeman, I begin to shake with fear....

(In the introduction of The Whisperers)



The Whisperers is a fascinating account of Stalin's rise to power and the devastating impact his oppressive regime had on the people of the Soviet Union. Instead of giving a dry account concerning how the communists were able to come into control of Russia and the purges under Stalin that were to rid the Soviet Union of “enemies of the people”, Figes focuses on individuals and their families. This up close sampling of specific persons brings to life how Soviet people were affected by the “reign of terror” that sent millions of Soviet Citizens (especially those even remotely related to the old Russian aristocracy) into slave labor camps during the thirties as Stalin, with almost schizophrenic paranoia, sought out anyone who might be a threat to his rule.

One can't solely blame Stalin, however. Countless people took advantage of the situation by turning in their neighbors and even their own family members. Everyone's word was believed. No proof was required. One simply accused another of being an “enemy of the people” and they were never seen again. People did this to co workers they had a grievance against. They did it to neighbors whose rooms in the same house (nobody could have an entire house to themselves) they coveted. They did it to a spouse they wanted to conveniently divorce.

If that is not appalling enough, what is even more so-if not simply confounding- is the passivity with which people accepted intimate friends and loved ones being taken away and sent to camps to pay for “their crimes”. A typical response was, “I didn't know they were an enemy of the people but since they are being taken away it must be so.” Many of the people who were arrested wouldn't fight their sentence, especially the hard line communists. Their belief in the socialist ideal was so great that a number of them would shout, “Long live Stalin!” as they were being executed by a firing squad.

Figes takes you inside the households of different families who lived during Stalin's time. He interviewed thousands of people who were still alive in the eighties and nineties to give a first hand account of what happened to them and their families personally. Because of this, one is drawn into a vicarious experience of what these people endured so many years ago. It was often with relief I quit reading a chapter and reminded myself that I do not live under that kind of regime (not yet, anyway-it seems that there are certain ideologues in this country and in our government who are working hard to take away as much of our individual liberties as possible.)

Still, The Whisperers leaves me with some questions. Is it possible for an entire population to be so completely deceived by an individual leader? Figes doesn't record any dissidents. At least they weren't dissidents during Stalin's regime. In retrospect, many (but not all) saw that Stalin was a despot. At the time, however, according to Figes, the Soviet Citizens firmly believed in the Communist ideal and justified any oppression, even genocide, as a necessary means to an end. A common saying was “you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet.”

Another question: where was the church? Was it rendered so ineffectual that it offered no solace, no amnesty? Had absolutely everyone become an atheist? Was Russia truly devoid of Christians back then? I'd like to investigate more into this matter.

In conclusion, The Whisperers is a captivating book filled with the whole colorful spectrum of different people's lives, their emotions, how they survived wondering if they or another family member was going to disappear, how they coped with parents in prison-leaving them as orphans; how spouses endured forced separations and how they themselves survived being a prisoner in a slave labor camp. It's a book that not only will hold you spellbound but one that will leave you seriously thinking about the fragility of democracy when people put their faith in a man made state rather than in moral foundations grounded in Christian principals.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Review of Books by Modern Christian Philosophers: Technology and Justice; In American Babylon: Notes of a Christian Exile; How Should We Then Live

Every person who wants to objectively analyze why our culture and society is shaped the way it is should read three very impressive books.:  Technology and Justice by George Grant; American Babylon: Notes of a Christian Exile by Richard John Neuhaus; and How Should We Then Live? by Francis Schaeffer.

It is hard to review all the depth and detail these books provide on a subject that is so relevant for today. So in a nut shell: all three provide an outline of the progression from Western Society's ability to think from a Christian base to thinking from a secular base. Each author in his own words detail how the “Enlightenment Thinkers” from the Renaissance turned the tide from using a belief system that was grounded in the fact that there is a God, that He created the universe for a purpose and He is reasonable to our modern mode of thinking that asserts there is no God, there is no purpose and it is impossible to reason.





George Grant (1918-1988), the author of Technology and Justice, taught religion and philosophy at McMaster University and Dalhousie University in Canada (according to the back of the book he was considered one of Canada's leading political philosophers). His book focuses on how the above mentioned evolution of western society's beliefs produced modern technology and how this technology influenced society's values. His last two chapters, dealing with abortion and euthanasia, are especially worth reading.








Richard John Neuhaus (1936-2009) was president of the Institute on Religion and Public Life and a Catholic Priest of the Archdiocese of New York.  In American Babylon: Notes of a Christian Exile, he follows along the same line of thought as Grant's book but centers his book on the modern day Christian and how he has to live swimming upstream in order to maintain Biblical beliefs in a society that is now blatantly predjudiced against those beliefs.





                                        Finally, Francis Schaeffer (1912-1984) is considered one of the greatest
 Christian thinkers of this century. In his wonderful book, How Should We Then Live? he follows along the same lines as the other books but with an emphasis on the impact the Reformation had on the sophistication of society and contrasts it with the secular humanists attempt to create “progress".  He vividly describes the impact  the aetheist viewpoint has had on our society (producing leaders and thinkers like Nietszche, Hitler, Stalin et al). Schaeffer also works more from the viewpoint of how our value systems are reflected in fine art. (i.e. When man believed in a reasonable God, his art reflected rational, understandable paintings and music. When man turned away from God he concluded that it is impossible to reason or understand anything-hence art without form or structure).




All three of these reviews are bare bones because there is so much meat in each book that I don't feel that I can adequately describe them in a blog. All I can do is highly recommend that you read all of them. Each book, though written by different men at different times, support each other's premise and if you read all three you will find yourself familiar with names such as Voltaire, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietszche, as well as many other philosophers and scientists that have impacted our modern society. These books are also valuable to the Christian because they articulate so clearly why it is far more reasonable to believe in the Chrisitan God than to reject Him.

One final thought: after reading these books, especially Schaeffer's, I realized that our public school system, in order to teach from a secular outlook on history, science and  socio-political events must give an inaccurate view of those subjects. In other words, in order to leave out God, educators have to cut out huge chunks of historical events-such as the Medieval Church and the Reformation's impact- very positive impact, I might add, on our society. To me this renders education sterile. How can one come to a correct conclusion about our life, where we came from, and why we think the way we do if a major component (Christian thought) is excluded?

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Review of The Imam's Daughter My Desperate Fight to Freedom by Hannah Shah

As promised, here is another book written by a woman who was raised Moslem. Hannah Shah (she's changed her name for security reasons) was born in Pakistan but raised in northern England. Hannah begins her story with the memories of growing up on a street mostly populated by Pakistani immigrants who left the grinding poverty of their homeland to make a better life for themselves and their families.


     Hannah starts off her tale with some good memories: walking by herself as a young child down the street going into whatever neighbor's house she chose where she'd be welcomed with some “Pakistani tea- water boiled with tea leaves, hot milk, heaps of sugar,and sometimes cardamon- and something to eat...curry or chapattis.”

     Unlike the other Pakistani fathers who worked hard at trades or professions, Hannah's dad was the Imam- the leader of the local Mosque for the community. According to Hannah, he used this as an excuse to live off the dole and the neighborhood's donations. He lived off English tax payer dollars but he hated white people. Hannah, other than at school, was not allowed to associate with anyone who was not Pakstani. Those people were goray-white people, nonbelievers. In his mind it was permissible to cheat and lie to them.

In fact, Hannah observes in her community and culture that it is actually acceptable to do anything wrong or sinful as long as one doesn't get caught. It wasn't the act that was wrong but rather getting publicly exposed. That would cause shame and dishonor to your family. Every action was determined by whether it would cause the family dishonor. There was no sense of mercy, either. If you did something that caused your family to look bad, not only you but every relative of yours would be ostracized. As Hannah develops her story, she exposes the horrible reality of her own living situation where it doesn't matter how many laws, bodies or spirits are broken, everything is tolerated and ignored as long as what's happening is not made public.

What starts out as a seemingly innocent story about Pakistanis living in England turns quickly into a nightmarish tale of a little girl's physical and sexual abuse at the hands of her father. Her family knows what he's doing but ignores it. The entire community reveres her father because he's the Imam. She points out that the neighbors have to hear what's going on inside her house but for the sake of the Imam's honor pretend they don't.

As a teenager, Hannah turns to a teacher for help. This teacher, meaning well, calls social services who send a Pakistani social worker to help her. Hannah decides to trust this man but he only reports everything to her father. His reason? “It's not right to betray our community...” Dishonor, shame etc..

For Omer, the honor of the community was always more important than the rights of any individual, even when that individual was a child being raped by the Imam.

Finally, Hannah reaches a breaking point. It comes when she finds out her father is planning to send her back to Pakistan to an arranged marriage. According to Shah this is a typical fate of Pakistani girls in England. They grow up in a westernized society and then, without warning or preparation, are plunged into a primitive, poverty-stricken one forced to live with an uneducated, often abusive man who is much older than they are. These girls are helpless.

When Hannah realizes her fate, she runs away. Another teacher, who is a Christian, allows her to stay at her house. This teacher helps her get the legal help she needs to stay safely away from her father. Receiving the unconditional love and acceptance from her teacher, teacher's family and church eventually led Hannah to Jesus Christ. For the first time she felt worth. In her own words:

I had expected God to rant and rave about how bad we humans were, not emphasize the love Bob (the pastor) kept talking about. God's love made him come to earth as a man to communicate with us and care for us... Love. Love. God's love. I felt my heart racing as Bob spoke, and I wanted to know Jesus. I wanted to be a Christian.

Disgustingly, her mother and father, first through tears and wails, try to get her to return to their community. They complain to her how they have all been shamed through her behavior. This same mother who never defended her, who ignored the beatings and the rapes is now distraught over how she would stand in the community. Her father, when tears didn't work, took to organizing mobs to threaten and harass her. For a long time Hannah had to move every few months.

Hannah Shah wrote this book to create public awareness about the harsh realities that are going on inside Moslem communities throughout England. In school, she describes how everyone studies all the religions, but no negative attribute is mentioned in order to create “tolerance for diversity”.

At school our politically safe lessons had avoided that dark and misogynistic side of forced marriages. It was presented as a cultural and religious practice that, while seeming strange to most British people, should be treated with respect and understanding. The reality- that this was often a shocking and brutal abuse of women- was left unreported.

According to Hannah, this is perpetuating the abuse of Moslem girls. It makes me angry to think about the Bishop of the Church of England who is advocating allowing Moslems to live according to Shariah law when such a law enables young girls to be abused and even murdered at times.

It is interesting to note that in this book, though I've merely recorded the stark events, actually is more even in its description of Moslems than the other books I've reviewed. Hannah is quick to point out that not every Moslem home is as hers was. She also says some very interesting things about the Koran and its mention of Jesus. Nevetheless, Hannah makes it clear that Islam is religion that motivates through fear. She found freedom through Jesus Christ when she found that He is motivated by His unconditional love for each of us.

For more information about Hannah Shah and her work you can go to http://www.hannahshah.com/  On this website she has book reviews of other books on the same subject she has written about. It also has links for women who want confidential help and advice.

Friday, August 6, 2010

What is tolerance?




For the first time I am having a guest columnist.  A friend of mine wrote me a response to the previous post that included my comments on Quakers and my review of two books written by Moslem women.  I thought that it deserved a greater audience than my e mail so here it is:


Your blog made me think about tolerance. I worry sometimes that Christians (not us) dismiss tolerance as being wrong, when really, it is misunderstood.

Tolerance is not acceptance…tolerance is tolerating something or someone you don’t agree with in order to have a place where you can share the Gospel.


Christ tolerated a Judas for quite some time, knowing he was wrong, and knowing he was sinful to the end. He kept offering the way out. Tolerance is not acceptance, tolerance is both disagreeing, yet standing firm when asked why we disagree with other belief systems and showing LOVE.


Intolerance is not always correct either, especially when it results in unrighteous criticism toward others. True, believers are not to tolerate sin, but it is God’s job, not ours, to not tolerate sinners. In truth, believers tolerate sin in their own lives all the time. God tries every way to show us why we are in need of him, he is intolerant of sin, but tolerant and loving toward individuals.


The only way I know to express intolerance correctly is to refuse to participate with sinful choices, but still love sinful people. I don’t express myself very well, but I get tired of being called intolerant. As a believer, I tolerate quite a lot in today’s mixed-up culture, but I don’t participate with it. The more I can do to separate myself from it, while still showing love to others the way Christ did…the more like him I’ll be.


The world is not only asking believers to embrace sinful ways, but to celebrate them. I think that when the world sees more true Christian grief over oppression and worldliness, then maybe our intolerance of it will be seen as truly righteous.

They say that Muslim women respond to the Gospel because they discover that God has a personal interest in them. They are not just useless women, they are his highly prized creations whom he loves personally and dearly. It sounds like one of the best ways to evangelize in the Muslim realm is to show women true Christian love – it is what they respond to.


Thanks for being the most well-read person I know (except for maybe my son Garret, who also loves to read). I look forward to hearing all about your summer.
Love,

T
My next book review will be about yet another Moslem woman who arrived at a different conclusion than Ali or Nafisi.  Someone did show her the unconditional love of Jesus Christ.  So stay tuned for my review of The Imam's Daughter.

Friday, July 30, 2010

Two reviews of books written by Muslim women: Infidel; Reading Lolita in Iran

Coexist Bumper Sticker



I saw the above bumber sticker on a car during my recent visit to Philadelphia. I saw many such signs and bumper stickers there. It seems to be a popular slogan with many people today that all we need to do is learn to get along with each other, don't confront people about their different beliefs, just accept them and understand that we each have our "own reality". Then we would have peace and harmony.
While there I also visited a Quaker meeting house (there are alot of Quaker meeting houses in the city of brotherly love.) At this particular Quaker house there was -to me- a type of commune where people would come and attend workshops to learn about different philosophies and how to achieve world peace through mutual understanding and respect. While purusing their bookstore I saw that whole shelves were devoted to books on Islam. My companion asked the proprietor why this was. Her answer: "Well, as Quakers, we are universalists. We want to study all cultures and beliefs so we can understand each other. We want to learn about every belief. That is how we can do away with fears and prejudices. We openly celebrate every religion and its link to God. That's the Quaker way."
I have a few arguements with the above mentioned attitudes and philosophies. First of all, who says our goal here on earth is to live in peace and harmony with one another? According to the Bible,our goal is to have the barrior of sin removed between us and God. That only happens when we accept Jesus Christ's reparation for that sin. Peace and harmony will be ushered in when Jesus returns to earth to claim those that have had that sin barrior removed.
Secondly, it takes profound ignorance to consider all religions and value systems as compatible or even worthy of respect. Injustice and tyranny shouldn't be tolerated. Systems and laws that break the ten commandments shouldn't be celebrated. We shouldn't try to coexist with cruel living practices.
The following books were both written by Muslim women. Anyone reading these accounts will not be able to continue in a complacent attitude toward religions that are counter to the teachings of Christ-if they claim to follow His teachings.











Infidel is a stark account of Ayaan's life growing up in Somali under a mixture of tribal and Islamic customs. She details her mother's first marriage and, even though she lived in luxury and comfort, demanded a divorce because her marriage was arranged. Her mother later met Ayaan's father and, despite knowing that he already had a wife and child, struck up a relationship and eventually married him. He later left her and married another woman. This sets the back drop for Ayaan's childhood with a mother who is bitter, angry, frustrated, and constantly lamenting her misfortune. Ayaan and her sister suffer the brunt of her anger with many brutal beatings and by being treated like servants while her brother is allowed to run wild. All of this is the will of Allah, she is told. Her grandmother, who lives with them, mixes this with many tribal customs and a horrible scene is described where Ayaan and her sister are genitally mutilated at the hands of her grandmother and other relatives. This happens while she is in grade school and her sister only four years of age.
At first Ayaan believes that she must learn to be a good Muslim and study the Koran diligently. (Studying the Koran actually means repeating the verses in Arabic by rote even though she does not know Arabic.) She wears the Burqa because she is taught that if men see any part of female flesh they will lose complete control of themselves. Allah, she is told, is just and merciful. Her own innate sense of justice tells her that Allah could not allow the atrocities that are going on in his name. As she studies the Koran in English, however, she realizes that those that are killing in Allah's name are, in fact, following the Koranic teachings and that women are considered to be worth only half a man.
Between the fear and oppression from trying to follow a religious law she can never live up to and the war between factions in her country, Ayaan eventually escapes to Europe as a refugee. In Holland she receives state welfare and, in fact, is encouraged by the social workers there to stay on welfare as most of the African refugees do. Ayaan, refuses to do this, gets hired as a translator, puts herself through school and university and eventually ends up as a member of the Dutch parliament.
While living in Holland, Ayaan sees order and justice, a dramatic contrast from the chaos and violence of her upbringing. Ayaan analyzes this and concludes that it is the blind following of religion that causes the gross inhumanity and disorder in the world. She remarks that the same happened in Europe under the Christian religion until the age of reason when the atheists “enlightened” the continent. Eventually Ayaan becomes a self-proclaimed atheist, a fact that must have so delighted Christopher Hitchens that he wrote the Introduction to her book.
(I'll interject here that she probably learned that slant of European history while in the secular colleges of Holland but that is not historically accurate. The advent of the printing press which enabled the masses to read the Bible for themselves rather than being misinformed by political leaders who wanted to control the populace through fear is what actually enlightened the masses. In fact, it's not Christians who follow the Bible that use terrorism or violence but those who profess Christ and distort His word.)
Ayaan wrote this book because she became increasingly concerned with the Muslim refugees who were growing in population across Europe. They are basically living off the state and refusing to integrate into European society. Ayaan tells the Dutch people that young girls are being genitally mutilated on the kitchen tables in Dutch neighborhoods and they need to put a stop to it.
In conclusion, Infidel is a book rich in ethnic color and tradition. But it will draw you into a world filled with violence, abuse and oppression made all the more horrific because it is happening right now all over the world and even in our own country where fundamentalist Muslims are living according to Shariah law rather than our own American constitution.
As a side note, I'll add that Ayaan has since immigrated to the United States and from different interviews I've seen and read of her, she seems to be realizing that one can have a Christian nation and live in order and peace as well. I will be interested to see how her beliefs develop and it is my earnest prayer that she comes to know Christ as her savior and then, finally know the ultimate freedom. Freedom from one's own sinful nature.
My review is a bare skeletal outline of Infidel. I have left out all the rich color and detail that Ayaan has so beautifully written into her story. This book is a fast read. I read it in three days. I also think it is a must read because of the growing Islamic threat in our own country.












This is yet another woman's account of living in an Islamic country. Nafisi writes of her life as an English professor in an Iranian university and the transformation that takes place in her country as Ayatollah Khomeini comes into power. Iran, under the Shah, was a highly educated, westernized society. Under Khomeini, it is plunged back into the dark ages as fundamentalist Islam takes over. Women, once dressed in western fashion, are now hidden under chadors. The country becomes a police state with each citizen living in terror, never knowing when their home is going to be invaded by police to investigate the owning of any “reported western parphanelia” such as records, clothes or books. It is the loss of her beloved books that Nafisi finds the most intolerable. She is no longer allowed to teach all the European and American classics that are so dear to her.
She decides to do a brave thing. She holds secret weekly meetings in her apartment with select female students to study authors such as Jane Austin, F. Scott Fitzgerald and Vladimir Nabokov.
At first I found this book enjoyable as she describes various Iranian customs and plays hostess to her small reading group, serving Iranian delicacies, pouring coffee over one's ice cream and various other ethnic food. She describes the particular situation and history of each student. We get a glimpse of each girl's life, her family, how each copes with the current events of Iran. At these meetings each student takes a turn expressing their enjoyment over a particular novel.
Then Nafisi becomes tiresome. While I found her description of assaults against women and life under a terrorist state informative, Nafisi's main beef is not that the Islamists are doing anything immoral. She doesn't believe in morals. In fact, her favorite book seems to be Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov. (For those of you who don't know the story, Lolita is about a fifteen year old girl who, among other things, is drugged then raped by a fifty year old man.) She just doesn't think anyone should be telling her what to do. While she points fingers at the police who commit atrocities against the Iranian women, trumping up charges against them, throwing them in jail, assaulting them in the name of Allah, she waxes eloquent on the “beautiful writing” of a book that is about statutory rape and where the rapist is depicted as the hero and the victim as the bad guy (or in this instance, bad girl). She asserts that it's not the message but the artististic rendering of the story that matters. In fact, there's a strange feeling of irony as these Iranian girls talk about how much they enjoy the “beauty and poetry” of a book that depicts gross injustices against a girl while they live in constant fear of similar injustices being commited against themselves.
What also makes me impatient with Nafisi is her inability to understand cause and effect. She describes her own education at an American university and how she was a member of some Iranian “anti-American pigs” organization. While these “pigs” were giving her an education, she was participating in countless demonstrations against “Western imperialism”. She can't or refuses to connect the dots between her work in these anti western groups and Khomeini and fundamentalist Islam's rise to power in Iran. Interestingly, she is now a professor of English at Johns Hopkins University.
When I first saw the title of this book I figured it was somebody's story of how Islam is wrong because it doesn't allow Iranian women the freedom to be immoral (why else would somebody read a stupid book like Lolita?) My mother insisted that the book was in fact about the oppression that women living in Iran suffer from. Well, we both were right.
It is interesting to note that there is a video on youtube of Nafisi commenting on Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She insists that Ayaan is mistaken when she asserts that Islam is a religion of war and tyranny. She contends that the majority of Muslims do not live as Ayaan describes in her book, Infidel, only extremists. I agree with her but I also have to agree with Ayaan. While most Muslims aren't terrorists, most Muslims aren't following the Koran. As mosque centers increase in number around our country and the world, however, I'm afraid that may change.