This is probably one of the most
useful books I've read yet in learning how to write well. It is used as a part
of curriculum in a number of universities. It's broken up into
fourteen chapters which are then broken up into three parts. The
first part tackles a specific writing challenge, the second part
provides writing exercises and the third part includes one or two
short stories or excerpts from novels by (mostly) contemporary
writers.
Non fiction writers would
probably find the first couple of chapters worth reading. LaPlante
gives specific strategies in how to make your non fiction book flow
like a fiction book, which seems to be the reigning thought in
nonfiction books these days. She discusses how to notice the world
around us as a writer and how to lose the “writer's voice” when
putting those observations on paper.
Other good advice is on how to
ensure the reader uses all his senses when he reads your stories.
She devotes a chapter on how to give a story shape and how and where
to apply epiphanies.
Probably the most valuable thing
I got out of the book was on avoiding cliches. Cliched story lines,
cliched plot twists, cliched characters and especially...cliches. As
I reread my own writing, I'm appalled at how many well-trod
expressions I use. But at the same time, I have mixed feelings. On
the one hand, I don't want my writing to sound hackneyed, but I also
think that figurative or metaphorical speech is fast disappearing in
our culture because the younger generations are not reading books
that use rich vocabulary or colorful expression.
I bought a couple of books that
trace the origins of expressions. Where did “red herring” or
“white elephant” or “the die is cast” come from? Today's
young people don't care because they've never heard of these
expressions. This is not a good sign. It tells me that contemporary
literature has scraped the meat off writing and has left us with bare
bones.
Another good chapter was on
showing and telling. Speaking of cliches, since I've started writing
and reading books on writing, I've read “show don't tell” until I
can't hear it without rolling my eyes. I think anyone who's had to
sit through seventh grade English knows this rule by now, but every
“writing expert” I've come across shares this “pearl” as
though they were flinging a lightning bolt at my head.
Furthermore, LaPlante proves you
need both. In Chapter 5 she discusses the importance of narration
and when it's appropriate. She shows how an effective writer
skillfully dances back and forth between narrating and showing.
She provides an interesting chapter
on voice. She defines each of the voices(first, second, third,
omniscient) and provides sample writing in each voice . She shows
which is the best, which should only be used by Mark
Twain or Graham Greene and the tricky art of changing voices inside
the same story.
The only complaint I have is that
I really did not enjoy her writing examples. With the exception of
one short story by the Russian author, Anton Chekov and another by
Ernest Hemingway, all are contemporary examples. And all of them seem to belong
to the same “Life Sucks School of Angst”. The only thing I
really got from them was a more clearly defined idea of how I don't
want to write.
One last chapter was particularly
interesting on the importance of editors. She debates their power.
How much autonomy should they have over the author's work? Is it a
good thing or not? She then gives a fascinating account of one
author who won many prizes and became nationally renowned for his
work. It now turns out that most of his work was largely rewritten
by his editor. This is only just coming out because the author has
died and researchers now have access to his archives. In the end
LaPlante lets the reader decide for himself by including two short
stories-the same short story- supposedly by the same author. One was
edited the other not. The difference is like night and day. (Sorry, can't escape cliches.)
If you are a writing student or
someone who is serious about honing their skill, I would recommend
this book. And if you are a fan of the "Life Sucks School of Angst",
you'll even enjoy the samples.
More reviews on writing:
10 comments:
I have a theory that good editing is as important as good writing and that it seems to be a bit of a dying art. While the proliferation of self publishing does have a lot of good points I do cringe at a lot of what emerges from that, mind you I can’t talk the number of times I let spelling and grammatical mistakes through on the blog is embarrassing.
Sounds like a really great book! I hope I can get my hands on it before this year's NaNoWriMo!
^_^
Eustacia: I hope you get a lot out of it. Have a good day.
Arabella (I love that name, by the way): You are so right. I have a book I'm preparing and I want to do it the traditional way. I'm glad I can fall back on self-publishing but if I do, I will be spending money on a good proofer.
I am so with you on the mixed feelings about metaphors. Some cliches are indeed unbearable. But certain figures of speech like the ones that you mention can liven up writing.
I have heard that young folks are reading less however I must say that the ones that I am exposed to happily do seem to be reading a lot.
Brian: I know that other media competes with kids but schools, like the one where I taught, put a huge emphasis on reading. My only complaint-at least with my school- is that books were judge more for reading level than the substance. Instead of giving students the classics and a good dose of fairy tales, myths and folklore it was all artificial stuff created for exactly that age level. I think that's where the lack of rich vocabulary suffers with some readers. Have a great day!
Hi I came by to check out your blog. I like it!
~Lauren
I bought this book immediately. I can't wait!
Ryan: I hope you enjoy it. Have a great day!
Thanks, Lauren. I'll be sure to repay the favor. Have a good day!
Post a Comment