I'm listening to some lovely piano music, a Variations on a theme by Pierre Rode composed by Carl Czerny. You can listen to Vladimir Horowitz playing the piece here.
I work out at a gym and because I find stationary exercisers terminally boring I have to read while using them. Therefore while I jog away on the elliptical or step on the stair aerobics machine, I have a book on hand to while away the time. This is especially helpful on the stair stepper which would be hard to get through if I didn't have my mind on something else to block out the sound of my calves and thighs squealing in pain.
Usually I can't read fiction because reading literature is not something to gulp down. I read to savor the art of word choice, sentence construction and expression of ideas. One can do that while toiling away on an exercise machine, I suppose, but I find it easier to read non fiction where I can just focus on the facts.
Hence, I just finished the World of Rome by Michael Grant. Ever feel as though you uncovered a gem in the sand? That is what this book is like. It is one of the best histories of Ancient Rome I have ever read.
The book was published in 1960 and has stood well the test of time. I have had a hard time finding information on Grant today, because there is a popular YA author by the same name and his information kept popping up.
The back of the book says that Grant was President and Vice-Chancellor of the Queen's University of Belfast. He was a graduate of Harrow and Trinity college, Cambridge and is "universally acknowledged as one of the most eminent scholars of the classical Roman era." I've added more information at the bottom of the post.
Grant is very even-handed in his study of Ancient Roman culture. After giving a historical overview he breaks down every level of the society: the rulers, citizens, subjects and slaves; their religious beliefs; and their art.
Part III, their beliefs was especially interesting to me. He adequately compares and contrasts the different religious beliefs by people who believed in fate and the stars to those who were religious and also the philosophers. Of course he shows the obvious Greek influence and also fairly compares the Christian and Jewish beliefs and their place in the Roman world.
One part that I found fascinating and I formed a conclusion (Grant does not say this in his book): When Julius Caesar decided to overthrow the Roman Republic and established the rule of the Caesars, he guaranteed not only brutal despotism, but also the murder of every Caesar. If a Caesar is appointed for life, then how are you going to get rid of him since you can't vote him out? Really, shouldn't they have seen that coming or were they all too power hungry to think objectively?
I am currently reading Suetonius' account of the Caesars and I think perhaps a good many of them were insane. But then again, were they any more insane than any of us would be without any checks and balances to stop us from gratifying every selfish whim?
Another provoking statement concerned Roman entertainment. The Caesars knew if they could keep the population occupied with mindless entertainment, the coarser the better, they wouldn't bother thinking about how effective or adept their governing body was.
Cato the younger, as well as more opportunistic politicians, had felt that the only sound and safe policy was to keep the populace quiet by entertaining them and subsidizing their food supply. (pg. 106 Part II. State and Society Chapter 3, Citizens of Rome)...
All subsequent emperors agreed that this dual formula of 'bread and entertainments' was the right one and participation in politics the wrong one, for the Roman proletariat. (pg. 107)
Hmmmmm...... Entertainment around the clock and free stuff...where have I seen that?
I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in the subject. It is a book I plan to return to again.
Michael Grant has written several books, a few of which I have since ordered and eagerly look forward to reading.
Michael Grant CBE (21 November 1914 – 4 October 2004) was an English classicist, and author of numerous popular books on ancient history. His 1956 translation of Tacitus' Annals of Imperial Rome remains a standard of the work. Having studied and held a number of academic posts in the United Kingdom and the Middle East, he retired early to devote himself fully to writing. He once described himself as "one of the very few freelancers in the field of ancient history: a rare phenomenon". His hallmarks were his prolific output and his unwillingness to oversimplify or talk down to his readership. He published over 70 works. from Wikipedia
I work out at a gym and because I find stationary exercisers terminally boring I have to read while using them. Therefore while I jog away on the elliptical or step on the stair aerobics machine, I have a book on hand to while away the time. This is especially helpful on the stair stepper which would be hard to get through if I didn't have my mind on something else to block out the sound of my calves and thighs squealing in pain.
Usually I can't read fiction because reading literature is not something to gulp down. I read to savor the art of word choice, sentence construction and expression of ideas. One can do that while toiling away on an exercise machine, I suppose, but I find it easier to read non fiction where I can just focus on the facts.
Hence, I just finished the World of Rome by Michael Grant. Ever feel as though you uncovered a gem in the sand? That is what this book is like. It is one of the best histories of Ancient Rome I have ever read.
The book was published in 1960 and has stood well the test of time. I have had a hard time finding information on Grant today, because there is a popular YA author by the same name and his information kept popping up.
The back of the book says that Grant was President and Vice-Chancellor of the Queen's University of Belfast. He was a graduate of Harrow and Trinity college, Cambridge and is "universally acknowledged as one of the most eminent scholars of the classical Roman era." I've added more information at the bottom of the post.
Grant is very even-handed in his study of Ancient Roman culture. After giving a historical overview he breaks down every level of the society: the rulers, citizens, subjects and slaves; their religious beliefs; and their art.
Part III, their beliefs was especially interesting to me. He adequately compares and contrasts the different religious beliefs by people who believed in fate and the stars to those who were religious and also the philosophers. Of course he shows the obvious Greek influence and also fairly compares the Christian and Jewish beliefs and their place in the Roman world.
One part that I found fascinating and I formed a conclusion (Grant does not say this in his book): When Julius Caesar decided to overthrow the Roman Republic and established the rule of the Caesars, he guaranteed not only brutal despotism, but also the murder of every Caesar. If a Caesar is appointed for life, then how are you going to get rid of him since you can't vote him out? Really, shouldn't they have seen that coming or were they all too power hungry to think objectively?
I am currently reading Suetonius' account of the Caesars and I think perhaps a good many of them were insane. But then again, were they any more insane than any of us would be without any checks and balances to stop us from gratifying every selfish whim?
Another provoking statement concerned Roman entertainment. The Caesars knew if they could keep the population occupied with mindless entertainment, the coarser the better, they wouldn't bother thinking about how effective or adept their governing body was.
Cato the younger, as well as more opportunistic politicians, had felt that the only sound and safe policy was to keep the populace quiet by entertaining them and subsidizing their food supply. (pg. 106 Part II. State and Society Chapter 3, Citizens of Rome)...
All subsequent emperors agreed that this dual formula of 'bread and entertainments' was the right one and participation in politics the wrong one, for the Roman proletariat. (pg. 107)
Hmmmmm...... Entertainment around the clock and free stuff...where have I seen that?
I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in the subject. It is a book I plan to return to again.
Michael Grant has written several books, a few of which I have since ordered and eagerly look forward to reading.
Michael Grant CBE (21 November 1914 – 4 October 2004) was an English classicist, and author of numerous popular books on ancient history. His 1956 translation of Tacitus' Annals of Imperial Rome remains a standard of the work. Having studied and held a number of academic posts in the United Kingdom and the Middle East, he retired early to devote himself fully to writing. He once described himself as "one of the very few freelancers in the field of ancient history: a rare phenomenon". His hallmarks were his prolific output and his unwillingness to oversimplify or talk down to his readership. He published over 70 works. from Wikipedia
13 comments:
I have a few of Grant's books but have never read them so it's encouraging to hear that this one was so good. Thanks for recommending it to me. I believe Suetonius was known as something of a gossip so I'm not sure if his words are weighed as equally with other historians, but I understand that he's an interesting read. I need to plough through my Greek reading and start on the Romans!
Hi Cleopatra!I cannot recommend this book enough. I don't know if I have enjoyed a history book as much as this one.
I am not surprised to hear that Suetonius was a gossip. I just finished the first Caesar, Julius, and it definitely has its salacious parts.
Great review and one of interest to me. I will check on his writings. Thank you.
I have read a bit about ancient Rome. I find it fascinating. This book sounds very good.
The Romans seemed so brutal. It seems that other societies handled lifetime leaders in less severe ways. I recall that in The Rise of Rome, Anthony Everitt made the argument that in some ways, the Romans were particularly brutal, even in comparison to other societies that existed at that time.
: D
That's me reading your post.
While reading about the Roman Empire, do you see any connections to America today? Or really I should ask, "Are we not a lot like Rome?" Very scary.
Hi Ruth! Good heavens, don't get me started. I have always thought that unless there is a major Christian revival we are headed exactly down the same path as Rome, all the way down to our violent entertainment and accepted sexual mores.
People need to examine history, but I doubt any of that is being taught in public schools. They're still trying to get everyone to pass basic reading, writing and math skills. I guess I'm letting my prejudice show.
Hi Brian! I am not sure how the Romans compared brutal or otherwise with other cultures, although I hope to discover so through reading other histories. I'm reading 2 Samuel in the Bible and people were pretty brutal to each other there as well.
Come to think of it, I just finished the Iliad. Seems humans have always been bloodthirsty for power and glory.
I am also reading through the history of Japanese Shoguns which is fascinating. The Shoguns were not very nice to their enemies either.
As you point out in your review of Conrad, the human heart is capable of great darkness.
Hi Leona! Thanks for stopping by. I hope you will enjoy reading Grant. Take care!
This sounds so interesting, Sharon. Bread & entertainment does sound familiar :) we've been reading Plutarch's life of Marcu Cato, the elder who was apparently the younger's great- grandfather.
Hi Carol! I have a copy of Plutarch's Lives with the Harvard's Classics. I have only begun to read it. I need to go back to it. I am currently reading Suetonius' Lives of the Caesar's. I'd like to read as much as I can by the writers of that time period.
Sharon I’m seriously impressed by both your grasp of Ancient Rome and your ability to read while exercising! I can do both – but not together and I would probably end up injuring myself if I tried. Very interesting and well written blog post, thank you.
Hi Barbara! I do find Ancient Roman history fascinating especially as to how it leads up to own present time and culture.
I really could not exercise without reading I find it so boring!
Hi R.T. I hope you will be able to read this book. I believe you will enjoy it.
You are unfortunately not being paranoid. The college I work at is full of students who feel entitled to receive "free stuff".
Post a Comment